Commonwealth v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 96 Pa. Commw. 566 - Commonwealth, Bureau of Worker's Compensation v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board · 101 Pa. Commw. 552 - Commonwealth v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board · Commonwealth, Department of Labor & Industry v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board · 97 Pa. Commw. 520 - Dept. of L. & Ind. v. Wcab (Com. U. Ins. Co.)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“• A supersedeas must have been requested; • The request for supersedeas must have been denied; • The request must have been made in a proceeding under Section 413 of the Act; • Payments were continued because of the order denying the supersedeas; and • In the final outcome of the proceedings 'it is determined that such compensation was not, in fact, payable.’”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage“If, in any case in which a supersedeas has been requested and denied under the provisions of section 413 or section 430, payments of compensation are made as a result thereof and upon the final outcome of the proceedings, it is determined that such compensation was not, in fact, payable, the insurer who has made such payment shall be reimbursed therefor.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“at the very least the Department as conservator of the Fund is entitled as the basis for reimbursement to have an arms length or adversary type determination, rather than agreement with or without a referee's approval, on which the Insurer bases its claim, that the `compensation was not, in fact, payable.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.