Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 So. 2d 559 - Day v. Stickle

113 So. 2d 559 - Day v. Stickle’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
April 1991
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 1991

8 state decisions

4019591960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Holcomb v. . Holcomb · Wright v. Wilson · Shaneybrook v. Blizzard · Seligman v. Hammond · 81 So. 2d 645 - Herring v. Eiland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A ‘transaction’ between a witness and a decedent, within statutory provisions excluding evidence of such transactions, embraces every variety of affairs which can form the subject of negotiations, interviews, or actions between two persons, and includes every method by which one person can derive impressions or information from the conduct, condition, or language of another.” [Black’s Law Dictionary, p. 1688 (4th ed. 1957)]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““[N]o party to such action or proceeding, nor any person interested in the event thereof, nor any person from, through or under whom any such party, or interested person, derives any interest or title, by assignment or otherwise, shall be examined as a witness in regard to any transaction or communication between such witness and a person at the time of such examination deceased, insane or lunatic, against the executor, or administrator, * * *.” (emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.