Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 So. 2d 758 - Everett v. Mann

113 So. 2d 758 - Everett v. Mann’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2009
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2009

7 state decisions

30195919601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. Tullidge v. Hollingsworth · 30 F. Supp. 3 - United States v. Carrollo · 105 So. 2d 918 - Anderson v. Florida Real Estate Commission ex rel. Condermann

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * * * * "Moral turpitude involves the idea of inherent baseness or depravity in the private social relations or duties owed by man to man or by man to society. * * * It has also been defined as anything done contrary to justice, honesty, principle, or good morals, though it often involves the question of intent as when unintentionally committed through error of judgment when wrong was not contemplated. * * *" (Emphasis added) * * * * * *”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(e) Been guilty of a crime against the laws of this state or of the United States, involving moral turpitude, or fraudulent or dishonest dealing; and the record of a conviction certified or authenticated in such form as to be admissible in evidence under the laws of the state, shall be admissible as prima facie evidence of such guilt... . (Emphasis supplied).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.