Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 SO3D 1226 - Veazy v. State

Veazy v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 391 So. 2d 601 - Bullock v. State · 913 So. 2d 198 - Walker v. State · State v. Spratt · 453 So. 2d 1290 - Murphy v. State · 915 So. 2d 1052 - Chantey Music Pub., Inc. v. Malaco, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Robbery has three essential elements: (1) felonious intent, (2) force or putting in fear as a means of effectuating the intent, and (3) by that means taking and carrying away the property of another from his person or in his presence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The DEFENDANT, ARTEA CHILTON, has been charged with the crime of Armed Robbery. If you find from the evidence in this case beyond a reasonable doubt that in Forrest County, Mississippi: (1) Th[at] approximately $1510.00 in U.S. currency was the personal property of Tina Gibbs of which she was in lawful possession of [sic] by virtue of her employment at BancorpSouth; and (2) On or about October 19, 2012, the Defendant took the said property of Tina Gibbs, from (his/her) person and/or presence of and against the will of Tina Gibbs by placing Tina Gibbs in fear of immediate injury to his person, by indicating he had a deadly weapon, to-wit: a handgun; and (3) That said taking was against the will of Tina Gibbs; then you shall find the Defendant, ARTEA CHILTON, guilty of Armed Robbery. If the State has failed to prove any or more of these elements beyond a reasonable doubt, then you shall find the Defendant not guilty of Armed Robbery. If you find the Defendant, ARTEA CHILTON, not guilty of the crime of Armed Robbery, you may consider whether the Defendant is guilty of the lesser included offense of Robbery, and if you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that in Forrest County, Mississippi: (1) Th[at] approximately $1510.00 in U.S. currency was the personal property of Tina Gibbs of which she was in lawful possession of [sic] by virtue of her employment at BancorpSouth; and; (2) On or about October 19, 2012, the Defendant took the said property of Tina Gibbs, from (h”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Armed robbery requires the additional element of exhibition of a deadly weapon.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.