Faust v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
August 2017
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · 725 So. 2d 836 - Bell v. State · 590 So. 2d 1374 - Williams v. State · 993 So. 2d 400 - Simpson v. State · 781 So. 2d 925 - Brown v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f you find from the evidence in this case beyond a reasonable doubt ... that: 1. On or about August 17, 2013, that the Defendant, [Friston], negligently caused a motor vehicle accident resulting in the death of [West], a living human being, when he was driving or operating a motor vehicle, to-wit: a white Oldsmobile Alero, and 2. the Defendant, [Friston], was driving or operating said motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicating liquor, or any other substance, to-wit: marijuana, that impaired his ability to operate his motor vehicle, or 3. the Defendant, [Friston], was driving or operating said motor vehicle while having a blood concentration level of eight one-hundredths percent of alcohol (.08%) or more, then you should find the defendant guilty of DUI Death in Count One.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It is well settled that jury instructions generally are within the discretion of the trial court, and the appropriate standard of review is abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.