Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

113 So. 3d 859

Werts v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2012-05-04

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2013

1 state decisions

Relies on 738 So. 2d 988 - State v. Taylor · Alexander v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2012-05-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1John Werts appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm; however, as to his claim alleging the improper forfeiture of gain time, our affirmance is without prejudice to pursue his administrative remedies with the Florida Department of Corrections. If he is unsuccessful after exhausting those remedies, he may seek mandamus relief in the appropriate circuit court. See State v. Taylor, 738 So.2d 988, 989 n. 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Alexander v. State, 697 So.2d 1017, 1017 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

¶2Affirmed.

VILLANTI, KHOUZAM, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
/113/so3d/859 · .json · Public domain