Heiny v. Heiny’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 826 So. 2d 221 - Moakley v. Smallwood · 181 Ohio App. 3d 519 - Knott v. Revolution Software, Inc. · 620 So. 2d 786 - ROYAL OAK LANDING HOME-OWNER'S ASS'N v. Pelletier · Taylor v. Taylor · 12 So. 3d 314 - Austin v. Austin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When interpreting a contract, the court must first examine the plain language of the contract for evidence of the parties' intent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.