Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

113 So. 3d 949

Jules v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 8, 2013

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2013-02-08

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently November 2017

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2013-02-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The State properly concedes error on Appellant’s claim that his home-invasion-robbery charge violates double jeopardy in that it arose from the same episode as Appellant’s burglary-with-an-assault-or-battery charge. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and sentence on the home-invasion charge and remand this cause for further proceedings as warranted. In all other respects, we affirm.

¶2AFFIRM in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

GRIFFIN, TORPY and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.
/113/so3d/949 · .json · Public domain