Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 SW2D 589 - State v. Franks

State v. Franks’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2002
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 2002

5 state decisions

2019371940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Sullivan · Taylor v. Higgins Oil & Fuel Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The rale is settled that a junior survey must be made to conform to and harmonize with the lines and calls for older surveys, because the boundaries of the older surveys cannot be extended or varied to satisfy the calls of a junior survey.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.