Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

113 S.W.3d 227

Hicks v. Mayes

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 2003

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2003-06-24

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 2018

17 state decisions

Relies on Murphy v. Carron

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-06-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Father appeals from the trial court’s judgment modifying the child support and custody provisions of an order of paternity. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

¶3No jurisdictional purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

¶4The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

/113/sw3d/227 · .json · Public domain