Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

113 S.W.3d 250

Trumbull v. Moore

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 19, 2003

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2003-08-19

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 2019

6 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-08-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Defendants Lynn R. Moore (Moore) and Michael A. Foran (Foran) appeal the trial court’s judgment entered after a jury verdict finding in favor of Plaintiff Laurie E. Trumbull (Trumbull). The jury returned verdicts in favor of Trumbull in the amount of $13,300 on Count I of Trumbull’s petition, $100,000 on Count II, and $28,500 on Count III of Trumbull’s petition for breach of contract, and returned verdicts in favor of Trumbull on both counts of Foran’s counterclaim.

¶3We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

/113/sw3d/250 · .json · Public domain