Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

113 S.W.3d 692

State v. Palmer

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 2, 2003

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2003-09-02

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2005

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-09-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Defendant, Vera Palmer, appeals from her convictions for first-degree murder in violation of section 565.020.1, RSMo 2000, and armed criminal action in violation of section 571.015, RSMo 2000. She challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support her convictions.

¶3 Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we find no error of law or otherwise. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We *693 affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 80.25(b).

/113/sw3d/692 · .json · Public domain