Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

113 Tex. Crim. 527

22 S.W.2d 1069

Ruhmann v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 4, 1929

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1929-12-04

<p>The opinion states the case.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1953

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1929-12-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

¶2 This rehearing is asked upon two grounds: First, the insufficience of the affidavit for search warrant; second, the insufficience of the testimony to show possession on the part of appellant of mash for the purpose of making intoxicating *532 liquor. The affidavit is set out, and the matters pertaining to its sufficience fully discussed, and as we still think, properly disposed of, in the original opinion. The evidence, wholly aside from the finding of the still and a large quantity of whisky, is amply sufficient to show that the officers found hundreds of gallons of mash, and that a witness testified, as far as we can perceive, without contradiction, that from this mash intoxicating liquor could be made.

¶3 The motion for rehearing will be overruled.

¶4 Overruled.

/113/texcrim/527 · .json · Public domain