Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 U.S. 703 - Soon Hing v. Crowley

Soon Hing v. Crowley’s Empirical Analysis

113 U.S. 703 · 1885

Citation profile

586
cited by 586 later decisions
58
cited 58 times by the Supreme Court
47
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 48 district · 326 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 586 later decisions (58 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2016 · most notably McGowan v. State of Maryland Gallagher (1961), Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886)

21 federal appellate · 48 district · 326 state decisions — followed in 47 states

88018851890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barbier v. Connolly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 586 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The diverse character of such motives, and the impossibility of penetrating into the hearts of men and ascertaining the truth, precludes all such inquiries as impracticable and futile.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"The discriminations which are open to objection are those where persons engaged in the same business are subject to different restrictions, or are held entitled to different privileges under the same conditions. It is only then that the discrimination can be said to impair that equal right which all can claim in the enforcement of the laws. ( Soon Hing v. Crowley, 113 U.S. 703, 709 , 5 S.Ct. 730 , 28 L.Ed. 1145 .)"”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “... Laws setting aside Sunday as a day of rest are upheld, not from any right of the Government to legislate for the promotion of religious observances, but from its right to protect all persons from the physical and moral debasement which comes from uninterrupted labor. Such laws have always been deemed beneficent and merciful laws, especially to the poor and dependent to the laborers in our factories and workshops and in the heated rooms of our cities; and their validity has been sustained by the highest courts of the states. (Emphasis added.) 113 U.S. at 710 , 5 S.Ct. at 734 , 28 L.Ed. at 1147 .”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.