113 Wash. 2d 32 - State v. Ortiz’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (§ 276 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Molinaro v. New Jersey · United States v. Campos-Serrano · Allen v. State of Georgia · Smith v. United States · Selma and Meridian Railroad Company v. Louisiana National Bank of New Orleans
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“disen-titles the defendant to call upon the resources of the Court for determination of his claims”. Molinaro, 396 U.S. at 366 ; State v. Rosales-Gonzales, 59 Wn. App. 583, 584 , 799 P.2d 756 (1990) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Estrada“, has two bases: first, flight renders the appeal moot insofar as the appellate court's judgment may not be given effect; and second,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“having scorned the court's authority over him, the fugitive is deemed 'disentitled' to appellate action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.