113 Wash. 2d 35 - State v. Short’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 44 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 371 (Defense Drug Interdiction Assistance Act) · 10 U.S.C. § 375 · 10 U.S.C. § 5001 · 18 U.S.C. § 1385
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Berkemer v. McCarty · California v. Beheler · Marathon Oil Co. v. United States · 102 Wash. 2d 277 - State v. Dictado
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether the suspect reasonably supposed his freedom of action was curtailed.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“as soon as a suspect's freedom of action is curtailed to a `degree associated with formal arrest.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he only relevant inquiry is how a reasonable man in the suspect's position would have understood his situation.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Rivard · State v. DR
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.