Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 Wash. 2d 735 - State v. Leach

113 Wash. 2d 735 - State v. Leach’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

101
cited by 101 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
9
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

95 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 101 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2024 · most notably Georgia v. Randolph (2006), State v. Ferrier (1998)

95 state decisions

54019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 106 Wash. 2d 144 - State v. Stroud · Stringer v. Mississippi · 112 Wash. 2d 193 - LaMon v. Butler · Woods v. United States · 101 Wash. 2d 612 - State v. Acosta

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 101 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We do not hold that police must invariably seek consent from the suspect before relying on a third party's consent. However, when the police intentionally bypass a suspect who is present and known by them to possess a superior privacy interest, the validity of a third party consent is less certain.... Where a suspect is present and objecting to a search, implied consent by a third party with an inferior privacy interest is ineffective.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the police must obtain the consent of a cohabitant who is present and able to object in order to effect a valid warrantless search.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.