113 Wash. App. 111 - State v. Eaker’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
February 2008
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Neder v. United States · Pauley v. Beth-Energy Mines, Inc. · 101 Wash. 2d 566 - State v. Petrich · 110 Wash. 2d 403 - State v. Kitchen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“That on or between the 1st day of January, 1990 and the 31st day of December, 1991, the defendant had sexual intercourse with [M.F.] while [M.F.'s] parents were on vacation on the day that Judy Russel was babysitting [M.F.] and took him to his house at 1325 Isaacs Street, Walla Walla[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Eaker“Report of Proceedings (RP) at 60. M.F. recalled that he first made allegations about the abuse in 1995 and was interviewed by the police in 1996. M.F. acknowledged that, he may have”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Eaker“between the corroborating facts, so it does not make clear”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Eaker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.