Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 WASHAPP 122 - State v. Wilson

State v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · United States v. Powell · Dunn v. United States · 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · 127 Wash. 2d 322 - State v. McFarland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “I'm also going to find that the State has proven by a preponderance that these California convictions do exist. I think between the transcript that I have, the [docket] notes, the Informations, and the prior conviction, I have got to put all that together, considering all that, I will go ahead and accept that, as well.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A defendant's intent to assault an intended victim transfers to an unintended victim. An intent against one victim is an intent against all victims.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.