113 Wash. App. 347 - State v. Phelps’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 2010
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Ursery · In Re Goodwin · Commonwealth v. Pike · 114 Wash. 2d 867 - State v. Henderson · 122 Wash. 2d 440 - State v. Furman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“on condition that I stipulate to the facts related to that Count as set forth in the Certification for Probable Cause ... in support of the filing of the Criminal Information and any and all related police reports, and with the understanding that the charge described in Count I will not be re-filed against me as long as I do not re-enter any of the Counties of Clallam, Grays, Island, Jefferson, Kitsap, Mason, after four months have elapsed from the date of my release from incarceration for the charge to which I am pleading guilty; The defendant waives statute of limitations for a period of ten years.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Phelps“With the twin exceptions of prior convictions and information relevant to the plea agreement, no restrictions are placed on the subject matter of plea agreements and, subject to the strictures of the prosecuting standards and judicial approval, prosecutors and defense attorneys ... may reach agreements as to any of the traditional subjects of plea bargaining.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Phelps“The defendant agrees to extend the statute of limitation for refiling Count I for a period of 7 years from this Judgment and Sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Phelps
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.