Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 WIS 578 - Sandberg v. State

Sandberg v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1902

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
4
states following
July 2020
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 2020

13 state decisions

301902191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hopt v. People of the Territory of Utah · Stanley v. Schwalby · Dollar Savings Bank v. United States · Thompson v. State of Missouri · United States v. Barker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the rule that general statutes are not to be construed to include, to its hurt, the sovereign.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the marital status of the mother is a material fact in a birth record”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.