Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 Wis. 2d 347 - State v. Brooks

113 Wis. 2d 347 - State v. Brooks’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
2
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably 137 Wis. 2d 39 - State v. Zielke (1987), 128 Wis. 2d 15 - State v. Nordness (1986)

32 state decisions

1801983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 39 Wis. 2d 754 - State v. Hutnik · 64 Wis. 2d 485 - Scales v. State · 95 Wis. 2d 191 - State v. Neitzel · 83 Wis. 2d 891 - In Matter of Suspension of Operating Privilege of Bardwell · 108 Wis. 2d 319 - State v. Welsh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to get drunk drivers off the road as expeditiously as possible and with as little possible disruption of the court's calendar.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"[i]f one or more of the issues [set forth in sec. 343.305(3)(b)5] is determined favorably to the person, the court shall order that no action be taken on the operating privilege on account of the person’s refusal to take the test in question. This section does not preclude the prosecution of the person for violation of s. 346.63(1) or a local ordinance in conformity therewith, s. 346.63(2), 940.09 or 940.25.” (Emphasis added.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “"to obtain the blood-alcohol content in order to obtain evidence to prosecute drunk drivers. Such evidence was needed to improve the rate of convictions so that those who drive while intoxicated would be punished and so that others are deterred from driving while drunk. ... The accurate, scientific evidence of blood-alcohol level is to be used to secure convictions.” Id. at 355-56 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.