Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 113 Wis. 2d 643 - State v. Marshall

113 Wis. 2d 643 - State v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
October 2005
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently October 2005 · most notably 150 Wis. 2d 688 - State v. Blalock (1989), 196 Wis. 2d 817 - State v. Rogers (1995)

2 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

210198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · California v. Green · 106 Wis. 2d 368 - State v. Alles · 74 Wis. 2d 425 - State v. Lenarchick · 100 Wis. 2d 452 - Hagenkord v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Statements Which Are Not Hearsay. A statement is not hearsay if: (b) Admission by party opponent. The statement is offered against a party and is: 2. A statement of which the party has manifested the party's adoption or belief in its truth....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(3) Hearsay. "Hearsay" is a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to be confronted with the witnesses against him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.