¶1All concurred, except Kruse, J., who dissented and voted for modification of the judgment by striking out the provision requiring delivery of possession of the real estate to the receiver and also the provision which absolutely sets aside the deed and cancels the same of record. (See Harris v. Osnowitz, 35 App. Div. 594, and Moyer v. Moyer, 7 id. 528.)
114 A.D. 915
Reeves v. Converse
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 15, 1906
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1906-07-15
<p>Judgment affirmed, with costs.</p>
Decided 1906-07-15