Wing v. Jimenez’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 1978
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 12 Ariz. App. 434 - Payne v. Payne · 4 Ariz. App. 268 - Chemi-Cote Perlite Corp. v. Harborlite Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where the appellant questions the sufficiency of the evidence and no transcript of the evidence is submitted to the reviewing court, it will be assumed that the evidence- sustained the judgment. Che-mi-Cote Perlite Corp. v. Harborlite Corporation, 4 Ariz.App. 268 , 419 P.2d 398 (1966); Payne v. Payne, 12 Ariz.App. 434 , 471 P.2d 319 (1970).” Wing v. Jimenez, 114 Ariz. 346 , 560 P.2d 1253 (App.1976) (Emphasis in original)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Peery v. Hansen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.