Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 Ariz. 47 - State v. Castoe

State v. Castoe’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
3
states following
March 1992
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 1992 · most notably State v. Arnett (1978), State v. Jerousek (1979)

27 state decisions

140197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Faretta v. California · Gideon v. Wainwright · Jackson v. Denno · Beck v. State of Ohio · United States v. Ventresca

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[The Attorney General’s] argument is that the judge’s overruling of the motion to suppress was tantamount to a finding of voluntariness, and that to require the ruling to be a finding of voluntariness in so many words ‘is to enshrine form over substance.’ The argument is persuasive where it is clear that the judge understood Jackson v. Denno, supra, and merely worded his ruling badly. But in the instant case, it is clear that the trial judge did not understand that the duty of finding the admission to be voluntary was his and his alone, since he said, when he ruled, that it was really up to the jury to make that determination.” (Emphasis supplied.) 504 P.2d at 1269 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““If the teachings of the Court’s cases are to be followed and the constitutional policy served, affidavits for search warrants, such as the one involved here, must be tested and interpreted by magistrates and courts in a commonsense and realistic fashion. They are normally drafted by nonlawyers in the midst and haste of a criminal investigation. Technical requirements of elaborate specificity once exacted under common law pleadings have no proper place in this area. A grudging or negative attitude by reviewing courts toward warrants will tend to discourage police officers from submitting their evidence to a judicial officer before acting.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““The charging document shall be deemed amended to conform to the evidence adduced at any court proceeding.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.