State v. Condry’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 1990
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sullivan v. State of Arizona · Samish v. United States · State v. Young · State v. Hatten · Hackin v. Gaynes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The State directs to our attention in its brief the sentence which was imposed by the court below. It argues that the sentence was improper. We have repeatedly held that a cross-assignment of error in the absence of a cross-appeal can be considered only in support of the judgment. Hence, we do not reach the State’s second argument that defendant’s sentence was not authorized by law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dawson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.