114 Cal. App. 2d 220 - Wallace v. Sinclair’s Empirical Analysis
1952
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably Store of Happiness v. Carmona & Allen, Inc. (1957), Johnson v. State (1981)
5 federal appellate · 23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 3 Cal. 2d 427 - Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co. · Estate of Bristol v. Young · People v. Treadwell · 19 Cal. 2d 147 - Owen v. Cohen · Tyson v. Romey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“by 2002 and High Plains dissolved then. She is likely correct. A partnership is dissolved where, among other circumstances, it is not reasonably practicable to carry on the partnership in conformity with the partnership agreement or with the business relationship between the partners. Dissolution in such a case is an equitable solution to the situation where”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The extent of an agency is measured by the authority conferred upon the agent, actually or ostensibly, and his power is sufficient to do everything that is necessary, proper or usual to accomplish the purpose of the principal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““(1) On application by or for a partner the court shall order a dissolution whenever: » » # (e) The business of the partnership can only be carried on at a loss.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.