Lockheed Electronics Co. v. Keronix, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 20 Cal. 3d 90 - Steiner v. Mobil Oil Corp. · 177 Ind. App. 508 - Uniroyal, Inc. v. Chambers Gasket & Manufacturing Co. · Baumgold Brothers, Inc. v. Allan M. Fox Company, East · Koppers Co. v. Brunswick Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“expressly limits acceptance to the terms of the offer.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“"Plaintiff has cited to us no place in the record, nor have they stated any facts even without citation to the records relating to the prior conduct of the parties, that shows that LEC's terms and conditions. actually applied to the parties' dealings and performance. LEC's mere written attempt to substitute their own terms and conditions for Keronix's by virtue of a written statement in their acceptance to that effect, is insufficient to establish a course of conduct and to negate the effects of § 2207."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.