Dereus v. Peck’s Empirical Analysis
1945
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently June 2014 · most notably Barnard v. Gaumer (1961), Allen v. Smith (1964)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Leach v. Manhart · Sprague v. Stead · Gyra v. Windler · Starr v. People · Blanchard v. Holland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““An easement is a right ... authorizing one to do or maintain something on the land of another .... It is a privilege existing distinct from the ownership of the land itself, nevertheless it is an interest in land.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““The law is well settled in this jurisdiction that a decree for an easement must be definite and certain so that there may be no possible doubt as to its location, its width, length, and termini. Starr v. People, 17 Colo. 458 , 30 Pac. 64 ; Lieber v. People, 33 Colo. 493 , 81 Pac. 270 ; Gyra v. Windler, 40 Colo. 366 , 91 Pac. 36 ; Workman v. Stephenson, 26 Colo. App. 339 , 144 Pac. 1126 ; Sprague v. Stead, 56 Colo. 538 , 139 Pac. 544 ; Leach v. Manhart, 102 Colo. 129 , 77 P. (2d) 652 . “Under the authorities cited, the decree was defective in that it contained no definite and certain description locating the easement as the same crossed defendants’ lands.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Isenberg v. Woitchek
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.