Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 Colo. 437 - Holman v. Holman

Holman v. Holman’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
May 2000
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2000

11 state decisions

301946195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Emerick v. Emerick · Shaff v. Shaff · Myers v. Myers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If the party against whom judgment by default is sought has appeared in the action, he (or, if appearing by representative, his representative) shall be served with written notice of the application for judgment at least three days prior to the hearing on such application.. . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.