Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 Colo. 441 - Mosher v. Schumm

Mosher v. Schumm’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
4
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently September 2024

24 state decisions

60194619501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hanlon v. Woodhouse · Anderson v. Bartels · Colorado & Southern Railway Co. v. McGeorge · Arnett v. Huggins · Great Western Sugar Co. v. Parker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “since the cause was submitted to the jury on instructions covering both grounds for recovery alleged by plaintiff, one of which was valid and the other not so”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “impossible to determine from the general verdict returned, upon which theory the jury found for plaintiff”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.