Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 Conn. 79 - Joseph v. Donovan

Joseph v. Donovan’s Empirical Analysis

1931

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
February 2001
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 2001

13 state decisions

7019311940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Newman v. Gaul · Smith v. Waterbury & Milldale Tramway Co. · Ives v. Beecher · Hillhouse v. Pratt · W. F. Miller Co. v. Grussi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]ny person having occasion to examine the certificate could readily have ascertained in which of the two courts the action was pending, either from the recitals of the certificate itself or by enquiry.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.