114 Conn. App. 295 - State v. Gibson’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently March 2020
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Golding · Henderson v. Brown · State v. Williams · State v. Singh · State v. Stevenson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[Defense Counsel]: Good morning, Your Honor. Frank Canace for [the defendant]. I spoke with the state yesterday. I think we’re looking for a date for victim’s contact? “[The Prosecutor]: Yes. “[Defense Counsel]: May I have May 5, [2006] if that’s convenient with the court? “The Court: May 5? “[Defense Counsel]: Yes, ma’am. “The Court: Yes.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gibson“Under [Connecticut] General Statutes § 53a-31(b) `[i]ssuance of a warrant or notice to appear for violation ... shall interrupt the period of the sentence as of .the date of such issuance until a final determination has been made by the court....'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.