In re Stephens’s Empirical Analysis
114 F. 192 · 1902
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
May 1917
most recently cited
6 district ·
Relationships
Relies on In re Waxelbaum
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The debtor guilty of wilful fraud in the concealment of part of his property from his creditors, of which he is possessed when he seeks the benetit of the exemption, shall, on account of his fraud, lose the benefit of such exemption, and his property shall he subject to the payment of all just debts which he owed at the time such fraud was committed.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Boorstin · In re Cochran
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.