Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 F.1d 208 - The Richmond

The Richmond’s Empirical Analysis

114 F. 208 · 1902

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
November 1973
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 24 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently November 1973 · most notably Silver Line v. United States (1937), West India Oil Co. v. Compania Transatlantica De Barcelona (1924)

6 federal appellate · 24 district ·

12019021910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Oregon · The New York · The Ariadne · The Carroll · The Scotia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The lesson that steam vessels must stop their engines in the presence of danger, or even of anticipated danger, is a hard one to learn; but the failure to' do so has been the cause of the condemnation of so many vessels that it would seem that these repeated admonitions must ultimately have some effect””
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Art 20. When a steam vessel and sailing vessel are proceeding -in such direct ions as to involve risk of collision, tile steam vessel • shall keep out of the way of the sailing vessel.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““Where, by any of these rules, one of two vessels is to keep out of the way, the other shall keep her course and speed.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.