Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 F.1d 229 - In re Drake

In re Drake’s Empirical Analysis

114 F. 229 · 1902

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
July 1965
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1965

2 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

601902191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Carpenter v. Strickland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Nor will it profit to trace historically the meaning of the word ‘farming.’ In its purely agricultural sense, Its use is comparatively modern. Within the purview of this statute it is'understood to mean the business of cultivating land, or employing it for the purposes of husbandry; and a farm is a tract devoted to cultivation under a single control, whether it be large or small, isolated, or made up of many parcels. For a long time after the words began to be used in an agricultural sense they were applied to lands held on lease, and ‘demise, lease, and to farm let’ are still the operative words of a lease, but they are, in modem use, applied without respect to nature of tenure. Robinson Crusoe says, T farmed upon my own land.’ So it appears that the words have been used in their present sense for nearly 200 years. Under the proofs in this case the defendant had the direction and control of the farming operations upon all the land described, and was ‘engaged in farming,’ and I am of opinion that these, words cannot be given tbe restricted meaning which would take out of the. protection of the statute only those engaged in actual labor upon the farm.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.