Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 F.1d 963 - In re Lewis

In re Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

114 F. 963 · 1902

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
November 1949
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 1949

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2019021910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Slaughter-House Cases the Butchers' Benevolent Association of New Orleans v. The Crescent City Live · 'The Ku-Klux Cases' Yarbrough · Ex Parte Milligan · In re Chapman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The usual course on the application for the writ of habeas corpus is to issue the writ, and, on its return, to hear and dispose of the case. But when, as in tins case, the cause of the imprisonment fully appears by the petition and the exhibits thereto, the practice prevails for the court to determine whether, on the facts presented in the petition, the prisoner, if brought before the court, would be discharged. Ex parte Milligan, 4 Wall. 2 , 18 L. Ed. 281 . And where the hearing is had without issuing the writ an order may be made requiring the officer or person holding the prisoner to show- cause why the writ should not issue. Ex parte Yarborough, 110 U. S. 651 , 4 Sup. Ct. 152 , 28 L. Ed. 274 . Where the return to the rule shows all the essential facts, the case may be disposed of as fully as if the writ had issued.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.