Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 F.1d 97 - Parramore v. Taylor

Parramore v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

114 F. 97 · 1902

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
February 1908
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Parramore v. Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The patented device was ‘the first to design a complete detachable device, which sustained both stockings from a single existing point of support on the corset,’ and, notwithstanding the apparent simplicity of the improvement, the record discloses the labor and experiments required to produce a patentable supporter fastened to the front of the corset by a single point of support on the corset, and the inventive character of the device is made apparent despite first impressions as to triviality. Its novelty and utility ‘in its limited fields’ are manifest.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.