Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 F.2d 10 - Britt v. Commissioner

Britt v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

114 F.2d 10 · 1940

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
October 1987
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently October 1987

5 federal appellate ·

6019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Le Tulle v. Scofield · Helvering v. Minnesota Tea Co. · John A. Nelson Co. v. Helvering · Mfg Co v. Helvering · United Carbon Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““No gain or loss shall be recognized if a corporation a party to a reorganization exchanges property, in pursuance of the plan of reorganization, solely for stock or securities in another corporation a party to the reorganization.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.