Ruffino v. Lloyd

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Oct. 5, 1940.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1940-10-05

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1941

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1940-10-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Raine Ewell, of San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

¶2Wm. Fleet Palmer, U. S. Atty., and Russell K. Lambeau, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

¶3Before GARRECHT and DENMAN, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This cause coming on regularly for hearing on notice of default for failure of appellant to file brief within time as required by rule, and good cause therefor appearing, ordered appeal dismissed, that a judgment be filed and entered accordingly, and mandate issued forthwith.