Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 F.2d 116 - Downey v. Palmer

Downey v. Palmer’s Empirical Analysis

114 F.2d 116 · 1940

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
5
states following
September 2004
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 4 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently September 2004 · most notably Rossiter v. Vogel (1943), Sidebotham v. Robison (1954)

12 federal appellate · 4 district · 7 state decisions

1501940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pufahl v. Parks' Estate · McDonald v. Thompson · Brick v. Cohn-Hall-Marx Co. · Schenck v. . State Line Telephone Co. · Seaboard Terminals Corp. v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To require a new action to be brought instead of permitting the pending action to go on to trial, with proper amendment of the complaint to convert the action into one for fraud, seems an unnecessary and undesirable insistence upon the original form of the plaintiff’s statement of his case, which the new Rules were designed to avoid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.