Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 F.2d 545 - Caballero v. Hudspeth

Caballero v. Hudspeth’s Empirical Analysis

114 F.2d 545 · 1940

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
6
states following
June 2002
most recently cited

41 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently June 2002 · most notably Dorsey v. Gill (1945), Bins v. United States (1964)

41 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions

1401940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bowen v. Johnston · Morgan v. Devine · Hoke & Economides v. United States · Wilson v. United States · Athanasaw v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * The right to not be placed in jeopardy twice for the same, offense is a personal right. It is an immunity granted to the citizen by our constitution, and may be waived. The plea of guilty by the defendant constituted a waiver of this right. At no stage of the proceedings did he assert this constitutional guarantee. The defense may not now be raised for the first time by writ of habeas corpus.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““But the test is not whether the criminal intent is one and the same and inspiring the whole transaction, but whether separate acts have been committed with the requisite criminal intent and are such as are made punishable by the act of Congress.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.