Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 F.2d 599 - Jordon v. Bondy

Jordon v. Bondy’s Empirical Analysis

114 F.2d 599 · 1940

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
6
states following
December 1976
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 1 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently December 1976 · most notably National Mut Ins Co of District of Columbia v. Tidewater Transfer Co Inc (1949), Ross v. Sirica (1967)

22 federal appellate · 1 district · 12 state decisions

1601940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · State v. Guilfoyle · Sanford v. United States · Commonwealth v. Tauza · Jordon v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . there is no violation of either letter or spirit [of the Constitution] when he [the prosecutor] merely fails to disclose evidence of which he has no knowledge or fails simply to use or disclose evidence which is only vague, inconclusive and cumulative, as was that in question here. It has been held repeatedly that the prosecution is under no obligation ,to call all witnesses subpoenaed by the Government, and we now hold that it is no sufficient ground for release by habeas corpus from punishment lawfully imposed that the prosecution either does not discover or does not use as witnesses or disclose the names of persons whose testimony can be only cumulatively corroborative of facts fully proven by other witnesses or evidence. . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.