In re Stuart’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““(1) Place the child on probation or under supervision in his own home or in the custody of a relative or other fit person, upon such terms as the court shall determine. “(2) Commit the child to the Board of Public Welfare; or to the National Training School for Girls or the National Training School for Boys if in need of such care as is given in such schools * * *. “(3) * * * That nothing herein shall be construed as authorizing the removal of the child from the custody of his parents unless his welfare and the safety and protection of the public can not be adequately safeguarded without such removal.””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In re Kroll

2. “[were] homeless or without adequate parental support or care, or whose parents, guardian, or custodian neglect[ed] or refus[ed] to provide support or care necessary for [their] health or welfare.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In re O.L.

3. ““(2) Who is habitually beyond the control of his parent, custodian, or guardian; or “(3) Who is habitually truant from school or home.” 6”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In re Kroll