Ramallo v. Reno’s Empirical Analysis
114 F.3d 1210 · 1997
Citation profile
30 federal appellate · 8 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 58 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2016 · most notably Janet Reno, Attorney General v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee et al. (1999), Henderson v. Immigration and Naturalization Service Navas (1998)
30 federal appellate · 8 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 963 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (§ 105 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Weinberger v. Salfi · United States v. Munsingwear, Inc. · Johnson v. Robison · U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership · Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family Physicians
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(g) Exclusive Jurisdiction. Except as provided in this section and notwithstanding any other provision of law, no court shall have jurisdiction to hear any cause or claim by or on behalf of any alien arising from the decision or action by the Attorney General to commence proceedings, adjudicate cases, or execute removal orders against any alien under this Act.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“(c) Effective Date. "(1) In General. Subject to paragraph (2), the amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) shall apply [as provided under section 309, except that] subsection (g) of section 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (as added by subsection (a)), shall apply without limitation to claims arising from all past, pending, or future exclusion, deportation, or removal proceedings under such Act.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[Immigration Reform Act] now indisputably deprives both courts of appeals and district courts of jurisdiction to decide the instant action”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.