Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 F.3d 1271 - United States v. Bogle

United States v. Bogle’s Empirical Analysis

114 F.3d 1271 · 1997

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
4
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 7 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently June 2019

7 federal appellate · 7 district · 5 state decisions

90199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Rhode Island v. Innis · Michigan v. Mosley · Gordon v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “interrogation” for purposes of Miranda . Not all express questioning meets the definition of interrogation; rather, "only questions that are reasonably likely to elicit incriminating information in the specific circumstances of the case constitute interrogation within the protections of Miranda.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “even in cases involving express questioning, there is no interrogation triggering the protections of Miranda unless, in the totality of the circumstances, the officer’s questions were “reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response.” (Citations omitted.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “is an objective inquiry; the subjective intent of the officer is relevant but not dispositive .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.