Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 F.3d 1284 - United States v. Barone

United States v. Barone’s Empirical Analysis

114 F.3d 1284 · 1997

Citation profile

138
cited by 138 later decisions
11
states following
September 2024
most recently cited

85 federal appellate · 12 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 138 later decisions — most recently September 2024 · most notably United States v. Pirani (2005), United States v. McVeigh (1998)

85 federal appellate · 12 district · 14 state decisions — followed in 11 states

8101997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Olano · Ohio v. Roberts · Johnson v. United States · California v. Green · Griffith v. Kentucky

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 138 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'The corroboration that is required by Rule 804(b)(3) is not independent evidence supporting the truth of the matters asserted by the hearsay statements, but evidence that clearly indicates that the statements are worthy of belief, based upon the circumstances in which the statements were made.’”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “demonstrate 'an insider's knowledge' of a criminal enterprise and its criminal activities”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “A statement tending to expose the declarant to criminal liability and offered to exculpate the accused is not admissible unless corroborating circumstances clearly indicate the trustworthiness of the statement.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.