Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 F.3d 1392 - Alexander v. Whitman

Alexander v. Whitman’s Empirical Analysis

114 F.3d 1392 · 1997

Citation profile

84
cited by 84 later decisions
4
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 11 district · 15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably Nicholas v. Pennsylvania State University (2000), Curay-Cramer v. Ursuline Academy of Wilmington, Delaware, Inc. (2006)

22 federal appellate · 11 district · 15 state decisions

520199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Santosky v. Kramer · Hishon v. King & Spalding · Roe v. Wade · Daniels v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he fundamental purpose of a wrongful death action is to compensate survivors for the pecuniary losses they suffer because of the tortious conduct of others,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a statute withstands a substantive due process challenge if the state identifies a legitimate state interest that the legislature could rationally conclude was served by the statute.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[i]t is not the relationship that is affected ..., it is the ability to recover for the loss of that relationship.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.