Romanella v. Hayward’s Empirical Analysis
114 F.3d 15 · 1997
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 6 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably Bassett Entertainment Corp. v. Mashantucket Pequot Tribe (2000), Ninigret Development Corp. v. Narragansett Indian Wetuomuck Housing Authority (2000)
12 federal appellate · 6 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Angel v. Bullington · City of Indianapolis v. Chase Nat Bank of City of New York · Samuel Worcester v. The State of Georgia · Healy Nh v. Ratta · The Cherokee Nation v. The State of Georgia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he . . . court was correct in treating the tribe as an indispensable party,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“for substantially the reasons stated by the district court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“requirement that we strictly construe the diversity statute”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.